I think anything pre high definition is retro and everything after is modern era. So everything before PS3 and Xbox 360 is retro. The just puts the Wii, PC and handheld devices in an awkard to define place though.
I donât geddit. Please explained
Question: What is retro?
Answer: Your mom!
AKA @WerqKeen being funny
This is why I think years as a metric is more useful than generations or technological shifts. PCs are difficult to pigeonhole in on generation, but itâs easy to look at the launch year of a game and determine if it fits an age criteria for retro. I also think that the line between SD and HD is a difficult one to use as a delineator between retro and contemporary. On one hand thatâs because HD will itself become retro, and on the other, plenty of contemporary games are intentionally SD, yet not old enough to be considered retro. they may be retro inspired, but not retro in terms of age.
As for the Wii, it will be retro in just a little over three years.
You watch your mouth on speaking those vile words. I still remember picking mine up the other day. Itâs still 2006, right?
Lol, itâs ok, eventually you grow accustomed to being old.
What BMO said, just literal barrel bottom scraping humor.
KINDA LIKE HOW I WOZ SCRAPIN YOUR MOMâS BOTTOM
please forgive me lord
Yeah, I do agree itâs not the best way, PS2 games were still coming out long after the jump to HD as well. But the change from SD to HD has been an easy marker Iâve used to separate older from newer. If I picked an exact number I would say 25 years. I donât think 10 or 20 is enough, especially as more time passes. Itâs something that will probably continue to change as the medium gets older.
Just a few showerthoughts:
Has retro to be old at all?
If I make an old school game that plays and feels like, letâs say a GameCube game, but is released 2023, wouldnât people call it a âretro gameâ.
Cuphead was called a retro-platformer at release, but maybe more for the style than the platforming?
Vintage has as requirement âmust feel like a pre-existing time periodâ. A game could be vintage when there is a huge shift in technology that puts games immediately in the âbefore the shiftâ and âafter the shiftâ periods, even when they are not that old. Maybe thatâs what happens with console generations too?
Also the first ever video game was made in October 1958, which means in 2058 that could be considered an antique game (at least 100 years old).
I feel like a dinosaur now and go and brush my white hair.
In terms of new games being classified as retro, I would say it doesnât qualify as it may have a certain aesthetic, but is only utilizing the look and possible control schemes/ designs of games from years and decades prior.
I think retro nowadays as a term may be outdated and a bit muddy. Whether we could start using a different word altogether or more clearly define the current is certainly up to debate.
Yes.
It may be retro inspired but not retro. Using an aesthetic doesnât render something retro.
Vintage and retro are terms with some overlap, because in common parlance vintage and retro both mean âoldâ. But the term vintage is very specifically tied to seasons or years, and thus eras. While everything before a certain date may be retro, the vintage is more specific. I think this is where generations come into play, where we could say each generation itself is a vintage (the gen four era, the gen five era) or we can group them by tech (8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit, 128-bit, HD, UHD eras, etc.). All are vintage as a group but each is a distinct vintage, whereas everything prior to a certain era or vintage by chronological date is retro, and everything after that date is contemporary.
um ackchully dinoshaurs didnât have hair, they had hair like filament called protofeathersh, so conshider yourshelf schooled
No no, i am not an antique dinosaur, I am a vintage one, we have shiny white fluffy hair. Those old stinky reptiles, how dare to compare me to them!